• Greetings, Agents! Welcome to the The Division Forums. It looks like you're looking forward to Tom Clancy's The Division 3, but haven't created an account yet. Why not take a minute to register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to all of our forums and posts plus the ability to post your own messages, communicate directly with other members and much more.

Everyone Cross Your FIngers!

Status
Not open for further replies.

MichFan

Shoot 1st Ask Questions Later
With another Friday upon us the count down to the vendor reset begins! I am sure I am not alone when I say I am really hoping for the 204 MP5 blueprint to show up in DZ03. Everyone cross your fingers that this is the week for that blueprint. 

Could also use a solid 204 firearms mask blueprint as well in DZ02. Any others people are hoping for??

 
You'd do well to save your DZ funds until after Tuesday's update...the last brought patterns from the DZ to the B.O.O. and allowed their purchase with pxc instead.

As far as hopes, same as every week, a solid assault rifle.

 
Yea I am currently sitting at 1.7 mil DZ Credits and I am tired of running around with my Aug form when they first came out lol. I would take a AK 204, the Tac ACR was nice as well. 

 
I'm hoping for a decent weapon in the BoO. Still not ranked high enough for the good weapon blueprints in the DZ. Hopefully an MP5 or BM AK or another solid assault rifle. 

 
I've been using the 182 BM AK and love it so far. How do you think it stacks against the LVOA-C and ACR?
Personally nothing compares to the fire rate of the LVOA-C this is why I prefer it to BMAK and ACR. The BMAK is a powerhouse but I just love the LVOA-C. It's just all personal preference 

 
I've been using the 182 BM AK and love it so far. How do you think it stacks against the LVOA-C and ACR?
Just depends on what you're after. The BMAK hits like a tank compared to other Assault Rifles in the game while the LVOA-C and ACR have an extremely high ROF for an Assault Rifle. 

IMO the BMAK is better for PVE due to its high damage output while the ACR and LVOA-C are better for PVP due to the ROF. 

 
Just depends on what you're after. The BMAK hits like a tank compared to other Assault Rifles in the game while the LVOA-C and ACR have an extremely high ROF for an Assault Rifle. 

IMO the BMAK is better for PVE due to its high damage output while the ACR and LVOA-C are better for PVP due to the ROF. 
Exactly this, but I'd also add that  the BMAK does a far better job at distance as well.

 
This needs to be done, I don't even think that gun exists I am still running my 163 LVOA-C and I have a decent roll 204 ACR
I have a 163 LVOA-C with Brutal/Stable that I even use over a 182 LVOA-C I found with worse talents.

I've been using the 182 BM AK and love it so far. How do you think it stacks against the LVOA-C and ACR?
The big thing the LVOA-C has going for it is almost non existant horizontal recoil and a high RoF

 
Let's throw something odd out there... how about a solid 416?  I had one when I was sub-30 and used it forever.  I don't remember how well it worked but I really liked it.

 
Liking this tactical mk 16 AR from the b.o.o....feels like my BMAK, with only slightly less damage....the vector is ok, but nothing special

 
Blew my PHXC on the BoO vector last night. Don't have DZ rank for bluprints. 

Seemed sensible as it may make the incursion possible. Will try today. Fingers crossed!

 
I'm still hoping for an advanced performance mod...

...kidding.  :9_innocent:  Definitely AUG, but it's not like I'd have the funds for one...or the rank...or the skill to properly use it...orrrr

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Advertisements

Back
Top